FEWD at University of Vienna 2018.08.26 Bibliography about Peter Singer and his reception in philosophy and ethics. With special focus on bioethics and animal ethics. More at https://www.fewd.at/peter-singer-archive The research is based mainly on The Philosopher’s Index http://philinfo.org. The following bibliography contains nearly all 374 search results for: People as Subjects: Singer, P. Also this bibliography includes additional academic sources. Peter Singers Homepage: https://www.petersinger.info/
1.) Basics and Overviews
Camosy, Charles C. 2012. Peter Singer and Christian Ethics: Beyond Polarization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Düwell, Marcus 2009. Philosophical Presuppositions of Practical Ethics (Reply by Peter Singer). In. Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.). Peter Singer Under Fire. Chicago, IL, Open Court: 395-427.
Gensler, Harry J. 2009. Singer's unsanctity of human life: A critique. In. Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.). Peter Singer Under Fire. Chicago, IL, Open Court: 163-184.
Gruen, Lori 2009. Singer. In. Belshaw, Christopher / Kemp, Gary (eds.). 12 Modern Philosophers. Malden, MA, Wiley-Blackwell: 232-250.
Höchsmann, Hyun 2002. On Peter Singer. Belmont, CA, Wadsworth. (www.wadsworth.com )
Hooker, Brad 2014. The Appeal of Peter Singer’s Moral Philosophy. In. Perry, John (ed.). God, the Good, and Utilitarianism: Perspectives on Peter Singer. Cambridge, CUP: (In Print).
Huemer, Michael 2009. Singer's Unstable Meta-Ethics. In. Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.). Peter Singer Under Fire. Chicago, IL, Open Court.
Jamieson, Dale, (ed.) 1999. Singer and His Critics. Oxford, Blackwell.
Krantz, Susan Lufkin 2002. Refuting Peter Singer's Ethical theory. The Importance of Human Dignity. Westport, CT, Praeger.
Kuhse, Helga (ed.) 2002. Peter Singer. Unsanctifying Human Life. Oxford, Blackwell.
McMahan 2002 !!!!
Hooker, Brad. 2014. Acts or rules? The fine tuning of utilitarianism [The Appeal of Peter Singer’s Moral Philosophy]. In: Perry, John (ed.) (Ed.), God, the Good, and Utilitarianism: Perspectives on Peter Singer. Cambridge, CUP: 125-138. In conclusion, the philosophical threads out of with Singer’s morality is woven are a rule-utilitarian approach to questions about which laws and policies and rules we should have and an act-utilitarian willingness to undertake additional sacrifices to make up for others’ failing to do their fair share. On reflection, we might think that this act-utilitarian element renders the morality fit for saints rather than for ordinary human beings. We can hardly deny, however, its appeal as an ideal. (page 138)
Preece, Gordon R. (ed.) 2002. Rethinking Peter Singer: A Christian Critique. Downers Grove, IL, InterVarsity Press.
Princeton Weekly Bulletin 1998.12.07. THE PRESIDENT'S PAGE. The Appointment of Professor Peter Singer http://www.princeton.edu/pr/pwb/98/1207/singer.htm (2014.09.02)
Schaler, Jeffrey A., (ed.) 2009. Peter Singer Under Fire. Chicago, IL, Open Court. (www.opencourtbooks.com)
Williams, Bernard 2009. The Human Prejudice. In. Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.). Peter Singer Under Fire. Chicago, IL, Open Court: 77-96.
Younis, Raymond Aaron (ed.) 2009. On the Ethical Life (About Peter Singers Philosophy). Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Zuolo, Federico. 2017. Equality, its Basis and Moral Status. Challenging the Principle of Equal Consideration of Interests. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 25 (2): ? www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09672559.09672017.01286679 .
Zuolo, Federico. 2016. Individuals, Species and Equality. A Critique of McMahan's Intrinsic Potential Account. Journal of Value Inquiry 50 (3): 573–592.
Zuolo, Federico. 2016. What's the Point of Self-Consciousness? A Critique of Singer's Arguments against Killing (Human or Non-human) Self-Conscious Animals. Utilitas 28 (4): 465-487.
2.) Further publications, mainly articles in journals and books
Abelson, Raziel 2005. Moral Distance: What Do We Owe to Unknown Strangers? Philosophical Forum 36 (1): 31-39.
Alexander, John K. 2008. Eliminating the Harm We Cause: A Defense of Singer and Agent-Causation Responsibility. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1): 11-21.
Almassi, Ben 2011. The Consequences of Individual Consumption. A Defence of Threshold Arguments for Vegetarianism and Consumer Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28(4): 396-411.
Amato, Peter 1999. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 1999. A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation. New Haven. Social Theory and Practice 29: 515-522.
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 1927- Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Anchustegui, A. T. 2005. Biocentric Ethics and Animal Prosperity. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1): 105-119.
Anderson, James C. 1993. Species Equality and the Foundations of Moral Theory. Environmental Values 2(4): 347-365.
Anzenbacher, Arno 1995. The Ethics of Peter Singer (in Croatian). Filozofska Istrazivanja 59: 823-843.
Archard, David 2002. Selling Yourself. Titmuss's Argument against a Market in Blood. Journal of Ethics 6 (1): 87-103.
Attfield, Robin 1979. Supererogation and double standards. Mind 88: 481-499.
Attfield, Robin 1983. Methods of Ecological Ethics. Metaphilosophy 14: 195-208.
Baccarini, Elvio 2000. On Speciesism. Synthesis Philosophica15 (1-2): 107-114.
Bachelard, Sarah 2002. On Euthanasia. Blindspots in the Argument from Mercy. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2): 131-140.
Bailey, Cathryn 2005. On the Backs of Animals: The Valorization of Reason in Contemporary Animal Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 10 (1): 1-17.
Ballesta Ballester, Francisco José 2004. El concepto de persona de Peter Singer en: 'repensando la vida y la muerte, el derrumbe de nuestra ética tradicional'. Medicina y Etica: Revista Internacional de Bioetica, Deontologia y Etica Medica 15 (1): 91-107.
Baranzke, Heike 2012. “Sanctity-of-Life“ A Bioethical Principle for a Right to Life? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3): 295-308.
Bardon, Adrian 1998. Abortion, Property Rights, and the Welfare State. Public Affairs Quarterly 12(4): 369-381.
Barry, Christian / Overland, Gerhard 2013. How Much for the Child? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1): 189-204.
Baruchello, Giorgio 2002. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 1999. A Darwinian Left. New Haven. American Catholic Philosophical Association,76: 356-360.
Berker, Selim 2009. The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience. Philosophy and Public Affairs 37: 294-329.
Bailey, Cathryn 2005. On the Backs of Animals: The Valorization of Reason in Contemporary Animal Ethics. Ethics and the Environment 10(1): 1-17.
Benson, John 1978. Duty and the Beast (Reviewed Item: P. Singer 1976 Animal Liberation; S. Clark 1977 The Moral Status of Animals). Philosophy 53: 529-549.
Berkowitz, Peter. 2000. Other People's Mothers. The utilitarian horrors of Peter Singer. The New Republic (January 10): 27-37 http://www.peterberkowitz.com/otherpeoplesmothers.htm .
Bernstein, Mark H. 2010. Reviewed Item: Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.) 2009. Peter Singer Under Fire. Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 13 (1): 94-111.
Bernstein, Mark H. 2006. On the Dogma of Hierarchical Value. American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (3): 207-220.
Bernstein, Mark H. 2004. Neo-Speciesism. Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (3): 380-390.
Bernstein, Mark H. 1991. Speciesism and Loyalty. Behavior and Philosophy 19 (1): 43-59.
Bérubé, Michael 2009. Equality, Freedom, and/or Justice for All. A Response to Martha Nussbaum. Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4): 352-365.
Best, Steven / Nocella, Anthony J. (eds.) 2004. Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. New York, Lantern Books.
Best, Steven 2006. Weighing and Protecting Life. Beyond Speciesism, Welfarism, and Legalism. Organization and Environment 19: 284-288.
Best, Steven / Nocella, Anthony J. 2011. The Animal Liberation Front. New York, NY, Lantern Books.
Bindig, Todd S. 2007. Confusion about Speciesism and Moral Status. Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association 74 (2): 145-155.
Black, Max 1982. Why should I be rational. Dialectica36: 147-168.
Blackford, Russell 2009. Moral Pluralism versus the Total View. Why Singer Is Wrong about Radical Life Extension. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (12): 747-752.
Blumer, Karin 1998. Sind Tiere Personen? Eine Analyse terminologischer Kontroversen in der gegenwärtigen bioethischen Diskussion dargestellt am Beispiel der Position von Peter Singer. Theologie und Philosophie 73: 524-537.
Braybrooke, David 2003. A Progressive Approach to Personal Responsibility for Global Beneficence. Monist 86 (2): 301-322.
Brennan, Andrew 2003. Humanism, Racsism and Speciesism. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 7 (3): 274-302.
Brown, Geoffrey 1985. On pleasing all of the people all of the time. Theoria 51: 16-23.
Buckle, Stephen 2011. Assessing Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism. Drawing a Lesson from Rousseau and Kant. Journal of Value Inquiry 45 (2): 215-227.
Buckle, Stephen 2005. Peter Singer's Argument for Utilitarianism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3): 175-194.
Buege, Douglas J. 1997. An Ecologically-Informed Ontology for Environmental Ethics. Biology and Philosophy 12 (1): 1-20.
Burgos Velasco, Juan Manuel 2008. Persona 'versus' ser humano: un análisis del esquema argumentativo básico del debate. Cuadernos de Bioetica 19: 433-447.
Burgess-Jackson, Keith 2000. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Ethics 110 (4): 838-843.
Burr, John R. / Goldinger, Milton (eds.) 1996. Philosophy and Contemporary Issues: Seventh Edition Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.
Calef, Scott 1992. The Replaceability Argument and Abortion. American Catholic Philosophical Association 66 (4): 447-463.
Camosy, Charles C. 2009. Common Ground on Surgical Abortion? Engaging Peter Singer on the Moral Status of Potential Persons. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (6): 577 - 593.
Campbell, Courtney S. 1998. The Crumbling Foundations of Medical Ethics. Review Essay about Singer, Peter 1995. Rethinking Life & Death. The Collapse of Our Traditional. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (2): 143-152.
Caplan, Arthur L. / Callahan, Daniel (eds.) 1981. Ethics in Hard Times (Includes Peter Singer. The Concept of Moral Standing). New York, Plenum Press.
Carter, Alan 1998. In Defence of Radical Disobedience. Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1): 29-47.
Carter, Lucy 2007. GM Plants and the Third World. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1): 69-82.
Castrodeza, Carlos 1999. Ética, economía y derechos de los animales en un marco naturalista. Teorema 18 (3): 117-135.
Catholic Medical Quarterly. Journal of the Catholic Medical Association (UK) http://www.cmq.org.uk/ Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Chan, Kai M. A. 2003. Intransitivity and Future Generations: Debunking Parfit's Mere Addition Paradox. Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (2): 187-200.
Chappell, Timothy 2004. Absolutes and Particulars. In. O'Hear, Anthony (ed.). Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 95-116.
Chappell, Timothy 1997. In Defence of Speciesism. In. Oderberg, David (ed.). Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist. New York, Macmillan: 96-108.
Chartier, Gary 2005. Consumers, Boycotts, and Non-Human Animals. Buffallo Environmental Law Journal 12: 123-194.
Chartier, Gary 2008. Consumption, Development Aid, and Natural Law. Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights Social Justice 13(2): 205-257.
Christian Bioethics: Non-Eucumenical Studies in Medical Ethics, 1995- http://cb.oxfordjournals.org Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Campbell, Courtney S. 1998. Campbell, Courtney S. 1998 The Crumbling Foundations of Medical Ethics. Review Essay about Singer, Peter 1995. Rethinking Life & Death. The Collapse of Our Traditional. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (2): 143-152.
Chappell, Timothy 2011. On the Very Idea of Criteria for Personhood. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49(1): 1-27.
Chappell, Timothy 1997. In Defence of Speciesism. In. Oderberg, David (ed.). Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist. New York, Macmillan: 96-108.
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1994. Companions on the Way (Reviewed Item: P. Singer 1991 A Companion to Ethics). Philosophical Quarterly 44: 90-100. „and identifying a pervasive theme: namely, that God is dead, but that we needn't mind.”
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1988. Utility Rights and the Domestic Virtues: Or What's Wrong with Raymond. Between the Species 4: 235-246.
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1978. Animal Wrongs. Analysis 38: 147-149.
Clark, Stephen R. L. 1977. The Moral Status of Animals (2. Edition 1984). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Clarke, Ellen 2006. Anarchy, Socialism and a Darwinian Left. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences37 (1): 136-150.
Clarke, Melissa 2002. Ontology, Ethics, and 'Sentir': Properly Situating Merleau-Ponty. Environmental Values 11(2): 211-225.
Clune, Alan C. 1996. A Critical Assessment of Varner's Proposal for Consensus and Convergence in the Biomedical Research Debate. Between the Species 12 (1-2): 34-39.
Coady, C A J 2013. The Common Premise for Uncommon Conclusions. Journal of Medical Ethics 39(5): 284-288.
Cockburn, David 1994. Human Beings and Great Squids in Philosophy. Philosophy 69: 135-150.
Coghlan, Peter 2005. The Prodigal and His Brother: Impartiality and the Equal Consideration of Interests. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3): 195-206.
Cole, Phillip 1997. Problems with 'Persons'. Res Publica. A Journal of Legal and Social Philosophy 3 (2): 165-183.
Cole, Phillip 1995. Dangerous Philosophies. Radical Philosophy 72: 44-46.
Colosi, Peter J 2009. John Paul II and Christian Personalism vs. Peter Singer and Utilitarianism: Two Radically Opposed Conceptions of the Nature and Meaning of Suffering. Ethics Education 15: 20-41.
Coope, Christopher Miles 2003. Peter Singer in Retrospect. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 2002. Unsanctifying Human Life. Oxford. Philosophical Quarterly53: 596-604.
Cordner, Christopher 2005. Life and Death Matters. Losing a Sense of the Value of Human Beings. Theoretical Medicine 26: 207-226.
Corkery, Padraig 2011. Bioethics and the Catholic Moral Tradition. Dublin, Veritas.
Cornett, Russell 1986. Defining Morality. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 25: 547-552.
Cottingham, John G. 1983. Ethics and Impartiality. Philosophical Studies 43: 83-99.
Covic, Ante 1997. New Paths of Medical Ethics: 'New Medical Ethics,' Drustvena istrazivanja 23-24 (3-4/1996). Synthesis Philosophica12 (2): 559-571.
Covic, Ante / Hoffmann, Thomas S. (eds.) 2005. Bioethik und kulturelle Pluralität / Bioethics and Cultural Plurality. Die süd- und südosteuropäische Perspektive. Sankt Augustin, Academia.
Cowton, Christopher J. / Gunn, Christine J. 2005. Animal instincts in the commercial jungle? Reflections on Peter Singer's Ethics in Action. Business Ethics 14 (2): 176-185.
Cushing, Simon 2003. Against 'Humanism'. Speciesism, Personhood, and Preference. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (4): 556-571.
DAgostino, Fred 1998. Relativism and reflective equilibrium. Monist 71: 420-436.
Dahbour, Omar 2005. Three Models of Global Community. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2): 201-224.
Daniels, Charles 2006. Ought We Prevent Preventable Evils? Disputatio 20: 303-314.
Danielson, Peter A. / MacDonald, Chris J. 1996. Hard Cases in Hard Places: Singer's Agenda for Applied Ethics (Reviewed Item P. Singer 1993. Practical Ethics). Dialogue : Canadian Philosophical Review 35 (3): 599-610.
Dardenne, Emilie 2010. The Reception of Peter Singer’s Theories in France. Society and Animals 18 (2): 205-218.
Deckers, Jan 2009. Vegetarianism, Sentimental or Ethical? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 22 (6): 573-597
DeGrazia, David 1996. Taking Animals Seriously. Mental Life and Moral Status. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
DeGrazia, David 1992. Review of Singer: Animal Liberation. Second Edition. Between the Species 8: 44-50.
DeMarco, Donald 2003. Peter Singer: Architect of the Culture of Death. Social Justice Review 94(9-10): 154-157 http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/997190/posts.
DeMarco, Donald 2012. Reviewed Item: Camosy, Charles 2012 Peter Singer and Christian Ethics. Beyond Polarization. Cambridge, CUP. Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association 80 (3): 283-284.
DeMarco, Joseph (ed.) 1986. New Directions in Ethics: The Challenge of Applied Ethics. New York, Routledge.
Desmond, John 2010. A Summons to the Consuming Animal. Business Ethics 19 (3): 238-252.
Diamond, Cora 1978. Eating Meat and Eating People. Philosophy 53: 465-479. Reprinted in: Palmer, Clare (ed.) 2008.
Diamond, Sheila M. 2007. Response to Todd Bindig's 'Confusion about Speciesism and Moral Status'. Linacre Quarterly 74(2): 156-158.
Dias, Maria Clara 2010. Considerações Sobre a Questão da Justiça em Peter Singer. Ethica: Cadernos Academicos 17 (2): 19-33.
Dixon, Nicholas 1995. A Utilitarian Argument for Vegetarianism. Between the Species 11 (3-4): 90-97.
Dombrowski, Daniel A. 1997. Babies and Beasts: The Argument from Marginal Cases. Urbana, IL, University of Illinois Press.
Dombrowski, Daniel A 2001. The Replaceability Argument. Process Studies 30 (1): 22-35.
Donaghy, Kevin 1974. Singer on Speciesism. Philosophic Exchange 1: 125-127.
Dorsey, Dale 2009. Aggregation, Partiality, and the Strong Beneficence. Philosophical Studies 146 (1): 139-157.
Dunayer, Joan 2001. Animal Equality. Language and Liberation. Derwood, MD, Ryce Publishing.
Dunayer, Joan 2004. Speciesism. Derwood, MD, Ryce Publishing.
Dunayer, Joan 2007. Advancing Animal Rights. Journal of Animal Law 3: 1-32.
Duran, Jane 1990. Domesticated and Then Some. Between the Species 6: 176-180.
Eassom, Simon 1997. Sport, Solidarity, and the Expanding Circle. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 24: 79-98.
Eckenwiler, Lisa A. 2001. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Utilitas 13 (3): 376-378.
Edmonds, David (ed.) 2010. Philosophy Bites. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Aaron 2011. Facing the Animal: Finding a Place for Animals in Levinas. Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 53 (2-3): 149-158.
Elstein, Daniel J. 2005. The Asymmetry of Creating and Not Creating Life. Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (1): 49-59.
Engel, Mylan 2011. Review of Practical Ethics, 3rd Edition by Peter Singer. American Journal of Bioethics 11: 73-75.
Engel, Mylan 2001. The Mere Considerability of Animals. Acta Analytica 16 (27): 89-107.
Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 2002. Medicine and the Biomedical Sciences After God: Do Right-Worshipping Christians Know More Than Others About the Content of Morality? Christian Bioethics 8(2): 209-219.
Engelhardt, Hugo Tristram 2004. Moral Knowledge: Some Reflections on Moral Controversies, Incompatible Moral Epistemologies, and the Culture Wars. Christian Bioethics 10 (1): 79-104.
Ernst, Zachary 2007. The Liberationists' Attack on Moral Intuitions. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2): 129-142.
Faber, Arkadiy 2012. The Ethics of Emergencies and Non-Emergencies. Dialogue: Journal of Phi Sigma Tau 54 (2-3): 170-180.
Farland, Douglas 2007. Principles, the Methodological Challenge and Our Obligations to the Worst-Off. South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2): 133-142.
Feezell, Randolph M. / Stephens, William O. 1994. The Argument from Marginal Cases: Is Speciesism Defensible? Contemporary Philosophy 16: 7-16.
Felipe, Sonia T. 2001. Da Igualdade. Peter Singer e a Defesa Ética dos Animais Contra o Especismo. Philosophica - Lisboa 17-18: 21-48.
Ferre, Frederick 1986. Moderation, Morals, and Meat. Inquiry: 29 391-406.
Ferrari, Arianna 2011. Besprechung: Singer, Peter 2011 Practical Ethics - Third Edition. Cambridge. Tierethik 3: 127-131.
Ferreira, Sandro de Souza 2005. O conceito de pessoa e a sua extensão a animais não-humanos. Controversia 1 (2): 1-8.
Fink, Charles K. 2011. El argumento de la depredación. Agora: Papeles de Filosofia (Santiago de Compostela) 30 (2): 135-146.
Fink, Charles K. 2005. The Predation Argument. Between the Species 13 (5): 1-15.
Finnis, John 2013. Capacity, Harm and Experience in the Life of Persons as Equals. Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (5): 281-283.
Fischer, John Martin 1983. Review of Practical Ethics by Peter Singer. Philosophical Review 92: 264-266.
Fjellstrom, Roger 2002. Specifying Speciesism. Environmental Values 11(1): 63-74.
Fjellstrom, Roger 2002. Equality Does Not Entail Equality across Species. Environmental Ethics 24(4): 339-352.
Fjellstrom, Roger 2003. Is Singer's Ethics Speciesist? Environmental Values 12(1): 91-106.
Fleming, Lorette 1987. The moral status of the foetus: a reappraisal. Bioethics 1: 15-34.
Fox, Michael Allen 1978. Animal Liberation: A Critique. Ethics 88: 106-118.
Fox, Michael Allen 1978. Animal Suffering and Rights: A Reply to Singer and Regan. Ethics 88: 134-138.
Francione, Gary L. 2003. Animal Rights Theory and Utilitarianism: Relative Normative Guidance. Between the Species 13 (3): 1-30.
Francione, Gary L 1999. El error de Bentham (y el de Singer). Teorema 18 (3): 39-60.
Franklin, James 2003. Corrupting the Youth: A History of Philosophy in Australia (2012 Second Edition). Sidney, Macleay Press.
Franklin, Julian H. 2005. Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy. New York, Columbia University Press.
Franklin, Julian H. 2005. Animal Rights and Moral Philosophy. New York, Columbia University Press.
Franklin, Julian H. 2011. Animal Rights and Political Theory. In. Klosko, George (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy. Oxford, OUP: 756-767.
Frey, Raymond G. 1977. Animal Rights. Analysis37: 186-189. Reprinted in: Palmer, Clare (ed.) 2008.
Frey, Raymond G. 1977. Interests and Animal Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 27: 254-259.
Frey, Raymond G. 1978. Moral Experts. Personalist59: 47-52.
Frey, Raymond G. 1980. Interests and Rights. The Case against Animals. Oxford, Clarendon.
Frey, Raymond G. 1983. Rights, Killing and Suffering. Moral Vegetarianism and Applied Ethics. Oxford, Blackwell.
Frey, Raymond G. 1987. Autonomy and the Value of Animal Life. Monist 70: 50-63.
Frey, Raymond G. 1989. The case against animal rights. In: Regan, Tom / Singer, Peter (eds.). Animal Rights and Animal Rights. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall: 115-118 only 3 pages!
Frey, Raymond G. 1997. Rechte, Interessen, Wünsche und Überzeugungen (Original 1979). In. Krebs, Angelika (Ed.). Naturethik. Frankfurt a. M., STW: 76-91.
Frey, Raymond G. 2011. Utilitarianism and Animals. In. Beauchamp, Tom L. / Frey, Raymond G. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford, OUP: 172-197.
Fulda, Joseph S. 1992. Reply to an Objection to Animal Rights. Journal of Value Inquiry 26: 87-88. See also: Levin, Michael 1993. Reply to Fulda on Animal Rights. Journal of Value Inquiry 27: 111-112.
Fuller, Steve 2006. Humanity' As the Site for Ideological Conflict in the Twenty-First Century. Ludus Vitalis 14: 227-231.
Fuller, Steve 2002. Karmic Darwinism: The Emerging Alliance between Science and Religion. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie64(4): 697-722.
Gauri, Varun / Sonderholm, Jorn 2012. Global Poverty: Four Normative Positions. Journal of Global Ethics 8 (2-3): 193-213.
George, Kathryn Paxton 2000. Animal, Vegetable, or Woman? A Feminist Critique of Ethical Vegetarianism. Albany, State University of New York Press.
Gesang, Bernward 2001. Konsequenter Utilitarismus - Ein neues Paradigma der analytischen Bioethik? Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung55 (1): 24-51.
Glock, Hans-Johann 2011. Doing Good by Splitting Hairs? Analytic Philosophy and Applied Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28(3): 225-240.
Glock, Hans-Johann 1994. The Euthanasia Debate in Germany - What's the Fuss? Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2): 213-224.
Goldman, Michael 2001. A Transcendental Defense of Speciesism. Journal of Value Inquiry 35(1): 59-69.
Gomberg, Paul 1994. Universalism and Optimism. Ethics 104 (3): 536-557.
Gomberg, Paul 2002. The Fallacy of Philanthropy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32 (1): 29-66.
Gomez Alvarez, Jose Enrique 2003. La definición como principio argumentativo en la docencia en bioética: un ejemplo a partir de la noción de personal de Peter Singer comparada con la concepción de la Iglesia Católica. Medicina y Etica: Revista Internacional de Bioetica 14: 229-236.
Goodheart, Eugene 2006. Peter Singer's Challenge.Philosophy and Literature 30(1): 238-247.
Goodmacher, Chris 2007. Partiality and World Poverty. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2): 74-85.
Gordon, David 1983. Ng and Singer on Utilitarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13: 239-240.
Graft, Donald 1997. Against Strong Speciesism. Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2): 107-118.
Green, Karen 2003. Distance, Divided Responsibility and Universalizability. Monist 86 (3): 501-515.
Groll, Daniel 2010. Reviewed Item: Schaler, Jeffrey A. (ed.) 2009. Peter Singer Under Fire. Teaching Philosophy 33 (4): 418-421.
Grünewald, Bernward 1995. Peter Singers Objektivismus und seine versteckte Subjektstheorie. In. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik. 3: 403-414.
Hadley, John 2009. World Poverty, Animal Minds and the Ethics of Veterinary Expenditure. Environmental Values18 (3): 361-378.
Haji, Ishtiyaque 1992. Evolution, Altruism, and the Prisoner's Dilemma. Biology and Philosophy 7 (2): 161-175.
Hallich, Oliver 2008. Grenzen der Redefreiheit. Lassen sich Diskussionsbeschränkungen in der Bioethik rechtfertigen? Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 32 (2): 125-153.
Hanley, Richard 2004. A Modest Proposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 18 (1): 1-12.
Hannay, Alastair 1998. What Can Philosophers Contribute to Social Ethics? Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy 17 (2): 127-136.
Hare, John E. 1996. The Moral Gap: Kantian Ethics, Human Limits, and God's Assistance. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Hare, R. M. 1987. Why moral language. In. Pettit, Philip (ed.). Metaphysics and Morality. New York, Blackwell: 71-90.
Hare, R. M. 1988. Comments. In. Seanor, Douglas (ed.). Hare and critics. Oxford, OUP: 199-293.
Hart, Herbert L. A. 1980.05.15. Death and Utility. Reviewed item: Practical Ethics by Peter Singer, Cambridge University Press, 237 pp. New York Review of Books: 53-54. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1980/may/15/death-and-utility/
Haslett, D. W. 1984. Is allowing someone to die the same as murder? Social Theory and Practice 10: 81-96.
Hellsten, Sirkku Kristiina 2000. Towards an Alternative Approach to Personhood in the End of Life Questions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (6): 515-536. (Focus on P. Singer and L. Honnefelder)!
Herrera Ibanez, Alejandro 1999. ¿Qué ética queremos para el desarrollo sustentable? Ludus Vitalis 7 (11): 147-155.
Hessler, Kristen 2000. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Social Theory and Practice 26 (2): 353-358.
Herzog, Harold A. 2005. The Slippery Slope to Moral Chaos: Line Drawing and Animal Rights. Reviewed Item: Dunayer, Joan 2004 Speciesism. Ethics and Behavior 15 (2): 191-194.
Hills, Alison 2006. Reviewed Items: Singer, P. (ed.) 2006. In Defense of Animals; Sharpe, L. 2005. Creatures Like Us? Philosophical Quarterly 56: 468-471
Hom, Alison 2002. The Animal Liberation Philosophy of Peter Singer. Aitia: Philosophy-Humanities Magazine 23 (3): 5-8.
Hooker, Brad 2010. A reply to Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer. Ratio 23 (1): 111-117.
Hooker, Brad 2002. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Mind 111: 122-126.
Horta, Oscar 2010. What Is Speciesism? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3): 243-266.
Horta, Oscar 2011. La argumentación de Singer en 'Liberación animal': concepciones normativas, interés en vivir y agregacionismo. Dianoia (Mexico) 56 (67): 65-85.
Howard, Joseph 2005. The Moral Status of the Human Embryo According to Peter Singer: Individuality, Humanity, and Personhood. Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association 72(3): 212-228.
Howe, Edmund G. 2003. Peter Singer and Beastiality. Journal of Clinical Ethics 14 (4): 311-321.
Human Life Review, 1975- http://www.humanlifereview.com/ Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Hymers, John 1999. Not a Modest Proposal. Peter Singer and the Definition of Person. Ethical Perspectives 6 (2): 126-138.
Igneski, Violetta 2006. Perfect and Imperfect Duties to Aid. Social Theory and Practice 32 (3): 439-466.
Ipperciel, Donald 2008. Communautés morales et universalisme: Quelles sont les responsabilités morales des individus des pays riches envers les pays pauvres? Philosophiques - Quebec 35 (2): 369-392.
Jacobs, Russell 1994. Morality and the Limits of Sacrifice. Southwest Philosophy Review 10 (1): 1-16.
James, David N. 1987. Ectogenesis: A reply to Singer and Well's 'The Reproductive Revolution' and 'Making Babies'. Bioethics 1: 80-99.
James, Scott M. 2007. Good Samaritans, Good Humanitarians. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (3): 238-254.
Jamieson, Dale 2005. Duties to the Distant: Aid, Assistance, and Intervention in the Developing World. Journal of Ethics 9 (1-2): 151-170.
Jeffreys, Derek S. 2001. Euthanasia and John Paul II's “Silent Language of Profound Sharing of Affection:” Why Christians Should Care About Peter Singer. Christian Bioethics: Non-Eucumenical Studies in Medical Ethics 7 (3): 359-378.
Joerden, Jan C. 2000. Peter Singer's Theories and Their Reception in Germany. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 913: 150-156.
Joerden, Jan C. 1994. Besprechung: Muß dieses Buch gelesen werden? Zum Erscheinen der deutschen Ausgabe von Helga Kuhse/Peter Singer: Should the Baby Live? Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 2: 529-537.
Johnson, Edward 1991. Singer's Cookbook. Between the Species 7: 36-39.
Johnson, Lawrence E. 1983. Do animals have an interest in life? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 172-184.
Jones, Gary E. 1984. Singer on Rights and the Market. Journal of Value Inquiry 18: 51-56.
Jones, Gary E. 1983. Singer, Animal Rights and Consistency. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1: 67-70.
Jones, Gary E. / Perry, Clifton 1983. Equal Consideration and Animal Rights. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1: 87-88.
Kaczor, Christopher 2010. The Ethics of Abortion: Women's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice (Routledge Annals of Bioethics). London, Routledge.
Kamm, Frances M. 2009. Aggregation, Allocating Scarce Resources, and the Disabled Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1): 148-197.
Kamm, Frances M. 2007. Intricate Ethics: Rights, Responsibilities, and Permissible Harm. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Kaposy, Chris 2007. Can Infants Have Interests in Continued Life? Theoretical and Applied Ethics 28 (4): 301-330.
Karlsson, Fredrik 2012. Critical Anthropomorphism and Animal Ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (5): 707-720.
Kavanaugh, John F. 2001. Who Count as Persons? Human Identity and the Ethics of Killing. Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press. The book starts on page 7 with a long citation of P. Singer 1995. “The traditional ethic is still defended by bishops and conservative bioethicists who speak in reverent tones about the intrinsic value of all human life, irrespective of its nature or quality.”
Kaufmann, Matthias 1996. Ethikbegründung und Ethikanwendung. Jahrbuch fuer Recht und Ethik 4: 575-589.
Kawall, Jason 2012. Meaningful Lives, Ideal Observers, and Views from Nowhere. Journal of Philosophical Research 37: 73-97.
Keller, Simon 2005. Comments on George Schedler, 'Should Peter Singer Become an Ethical Meat Eater? Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (2): 159-162.
Kemmerer, Lisa 2007. Peter Singer on Expendability. Between the Species (VII): 1-10.
Kesselring, Thomas 2005. Internationale Gerechtigkeit Auf der Suche nach Kriterien. Studia Philosophica 64: 23-53.
Klesis: Revue Philosophique. 2016. Special Issue: Peter Singer http://www.revue-klesis.org/
Kitcher, Philip 2002. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 1999. A Darwinian Left. New Haven. Ethica 112 861-863.
Kittay, Eva Feder 2000. Relationality, Personhood, and Peter Singer on the Fate of Severely Impaired Infants. American Philosophical Association Newsletters: Philosophy and Medicine 99 (2): 253-256.
Kleinberg, Stanley S. 1996. Teichman, Freedom of Expression, and the Public Platform. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12 (1): 95-100.
Koch, Tom 2004. The Difference That Difference Makes: Bioethics and the Challenge of 'Disability'. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6): 697-716.
Kuper, Andrew 2002. Global Poverty Relief - More Than Charity: Cosmopolitan Alternatives to the 'Singer Solution'. 16 (1): 107-120.
Kuper, Andrew 2002. Facts, Theories, and Hard Choices: Reply to Peter Singer. Ethics and International Affairs 16 (1): 125-126.
Kupsala, Saara 2006. Reviewed Item: Dunayer, Joan 2004 Speciesism. Environmental Values 15 (2): 255-257.
Kutschera, Franz von 1995. Drei Versuche einer rationalen Begründung der Ethik: Singer, Hare, Gewirth. In. Fehige, Christoph (ed.). Zum moralischen Denken: Band 1. Frankfurt a. M., STW: 54-76.
Laing, Jacqueline A. 1997. Innocence and Consequentialism: Inconsistency, Equivocation and Contradiction in the Philosophy of P. Singer. In. Oderberg, David (ed.). Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist. New York, Macmillan: 196-224.
Lamb, David 1982. Animal Rights and Liberation Movements. Environmental Ethics 4: 215-233.
Landmann, Willem A. 1990. The Morality of Killing and Causing Suffering: Reasons for Rejecting Peter Singer's Pluralistic Consequentialism. South African Journal of Philosophy 9: 159-171.
Lara, Francisco 2006. La entidad de los animales y nuestras obligaciones con ellos. Signos Filosoficos 8 (15): 105-128.
Lara, Francisco 2004. Derechos de los animales y utilitarismo. Telos: Revista Iberoamerica de Estudios Utilitaristas 13 (1-2): 145-161.
Latkovic, Mark S. 2010. A Tale of Two Australians: John Finnis & Peter Singer Debate the “Moral Status” of the “Fetus”. Human Life Review / www.humanlifereview.com.
Leist, Anton 1991. Ethik der Abtreibung: ein Überblick. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung.
Leist, Anton 1993. Bioethics in a Low Key: A Report from Germany. Bioethics 7 (2-3): 271-279.
Lemos, John 2001. A Defense of Darwinian Accounts of Morality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3): 361-385.
Lenferna, Georges Alexandre 2010. Singer Revisited: Cosmopolitanism, Global Poverty and Our Ethical Requirements. South African Journal of Philosophy 29 (2): 85-94.
Levin, Michael 1993. Reply to Fulda on Animal Rights. Journal of Value Inquiry 27: 111-112.
Leuven, Joost / Visak, Tatjana 20103. Ryder's Painism and His Criticism of Utilitarianism. 26 (2): 409-419.
Levy, Neil 1997. What (if Anything) Is Wrong with Bestiality? Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3): 444-456.
Liao, Matthew S. 2010. The Basis of Human Moral Status. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2): 159-179.
Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association, 1932- http://www.maneyonline.com/loi/lnq Several articles deal with P. Singers work.
Llorente, Renzo 2009. The Moral Framework of Peter Singer's Animal Liberation: An alternative to utilitarianism. Ethical Perspectives 16 (1): 61-80. https://poj.peeters-leuven.be/content.php?url=article&id=2036278&journal_code=EP access 2020.11
Lockwood, Michael 1979. Singer on killing and the preference for life. Inquiry 22: 157 - 170.
According to Singer, it is not directly wrong to kill ‘non‐self‐conscious beings’, such as lower animals, human foetuses and newborn infants, provided that any consequent loss of happiness is made good by the creation of new sentient life. In contrast, normal adult humans, being ‘self‐conscious’, generally have a strong preference for going on living, the flouting of which cannot, Singer argues, be morally counterbalanced by creating new, equally happy individuals. Singer's case might be reinforced by taking account, not only of the preference for continued life itself, but also of other preferences for whose satisfaction continued life is essential. It proves difficult, however, to find a formulation of ‘preference utilitarianism’ which, while lacking other obviously unacceptable consequences, supports Singer's ‘non‐replaceability principle’. Also, Singer's position fails adequately to accommodate our conviction that the lives of human beings are, in general, more valuable than those of other animals. Finally, his thesis that lower animals (let alone human infants) are replaceable, has decidely counterintuitive implications.
Loftin, Robert W. 1983. Comments on Jones and Perry's "on Animal Rights". International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1: 83-86.
Luke, Brian 1992. Justice, Caring, and Animal Liberation. Between the Species 8 (2): 100-108.
Maclean, Anne 1993. The Elimination of Morality. Reflections on Utilitarianism and Bioethics. London, Routledge.
Maclean, Anne 1988. Reason, Human Beings an the "Houyhnnhms". Philosophy 63: 389-394.
MacLean, Douglas 2010. Is 'Being Human' a Moral Concept? Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 30 (3-4): 16-20.
Madsen, Peter 2004. Peter Singer on Global Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1): 183-196.
Maeckelberghe, E. L. M. 2002. (Mis)Understanding Singer: Replaceability of children or intellectual endeavour? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3): 297-300.
Magel, Charles R. 1985. Animals: Moral Rights and Legal Rights. Between the Species 1: 9-14.
Magel, Charles R. 1989. Keyguide to Information Sources in Animal Rights. Jefferson, NC, McFarland.
Mallory, Jason L. 2001. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 1999. A Darwinian Left. New Haven. International Journal of Politics and Ethics1: 93-95.
Mann, Jesse A. 1982. Ethics and the problem of world hunger. Listening: Journal of Religion and Culture 16: 67-76.
Manninen, Bertha Alvarez 2009. The Metaphysical Foundations of Reproductive Ethics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2): 190-204.
Manninen, Bertha Alvarez 2007. Revisiting the Argument from Fetal Potential. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (7): 1-16.
Manning, Rita 1985. The random collective as a moral agent. Social Theory and Practice 11: 97-106.
Margolis, Joseph 1974. Animals Have No Rights And Are Not The Equal Of Humans. Philosophic Exchange 1: 119-123.
Mason, Kelby 2011. Moral Psychology and Moral Intuition. A Pox on All Your Houses - About Singer. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3): 441-458.
McDonough, Richard 2009. The Abuse of the Hypocrisy Charge in Politics. 23 (4): 287-307.
McKenna, Erin 1994. Feminism and Vegetarianism: A Critique of Peter Singer. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1: 28-35.
McLean, Lesley 2009. How Ought We To Live With Nonhuman Animals? Peter Singer’s Answer: Animal Liberation Parts I & II (two papers). Between the Species 13 (9): http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/
McMahan, Jeff 2013. Infanticide and Moral Consistency. Journal of Medical Ethics 39(5): 273-280.
McMahan, Jeff 2008. Challenges to Human Equality. Journal of Ethics 12(1): 81-104.
McMahan, Jeff 2005. Our Fellow Creatures. The Journal of Ethics 9(3-4): 353-380.
McMahan, Jeff 2002. The Ethics of Killing. Oxford, OUP.
Meehan, Mary 1980. Abortion: The Left Has Betrayed the Sanctity of Life. The Progressive 44 (September).
Meggle, Georg / Rippe, Klaus P. / Wessels, Ulla (Hg.) 1992. Almanach der praktischen Ethik. Forscher - Institutionen - Themen. Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.
Melle, Ullrich 2000. Right to Animals or Animal Rights? (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 62: 495-520.
Melle, Ullrich 1994. De zaak van de dieren. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 56 (4): 752-763.
Melle, Ulrich 1988. Tiere in der Ethik: Die Frage nach der Grenze der moralischen Gemeinschaft. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 42: 247-273.
Mendieta, Eduardo 2004. Habermas on Human Cloning: The Debate on the Future of the Species. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30: 721-743.
Mendieta, Eduardo 2011. Animal Is to Kantianism as Jew Is to Fascism - Adornos Bestiary. In. Sanbonmatsu, John (Ed.). Critical Theory and Animal Liberation. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers: 147-160.
Michelini, Dorando J. / Romero, Eduardo O. 2012. Persona humana y dignidad: Una perspectiva ético-discursiva. Estudios Filosoficos 61: 141-153.
Mirkes, Renee 2003. The Wrongs of Animal Rights. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly - USA 3 (2): 287-307.
Mizzoni, John 2010. Recent Work on Evolution and Social Contract Ethics. Journal of Value Inquiry 44 (3): 377-388.
Monfort Prades, Juan Manual 2010. Julián Marías: Una reapuesta responsible al problema del aborto. Cuadernos de Bioetica - Santiago de Compostela 21 (73): 341-354.
Moore, Andrew 2004. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 2002. Unsanctifying Human Life. Essays on Ethics by Peter Singer. (Edited by Helga Kuhse). Oxford, Blackwell. Philosophical Books 45 (4): 377-379.
Müller, Anselm Winfried 1997. Totale Toleranz in Sachen Singer? Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 51(3): 448-470.
Müller, Anselm Winfried 1977. Radical Subjectivity. Morality versus Utilitarianism. Ratio 19: 115-132.
Munshi, Surendra 2006. Ethics in the Era of Globalization: A Critique of Peter Singer. Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 8 (1): 122-128.
Muscari, Paul G. 1986. Is man the paragon of animal? Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (3): 303-308.
Narveson, Jan 1977. Animal Rights. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7: 161-178.
Narveson, Jan 1983. Animal Rights Revisited. In: Miller, Harlan (Ed.). Ethics and Animals. Clifton, Humana Press: 45-60. Reprinted in: Palmer, Clare (ed.) 2008.
Narveson, Jan 1987. On a Case for Animal Rights. Monist70(1): 31-49.
National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly - USA, 2001- http://ncbcenter.metapress.com/ Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Neumaier, Otto 1991. Bemerkungen zu Singers Thesen. Kriterion 1 (2): 11-28.
Nichols, Peter 2012. Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method of Justification in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (5): 325-341.
Nielsen, Kai 1979. On deriving and ought from an is: A retorspective look. Review of Metaphysics 32: 487-514.
Norcross, Alastair 2005. Peacemaking Philosophy or Appeasement? Sterba's Argument for Compromise. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2): 285-296.
Norman, Richard / Francis, Leslie Pickering 1978. Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others. Philosophy 53: 507-527.
Oakley, Justin 2005. Consequentialism, Complacency, and Slippery Slope Arguments. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3): 227-239.
Oderberg, David, (ed.) 1997. Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics, St. Martin`s.
Oderberg, David 2000, ²2005. Moral Theory. A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Oxford, Blackwell.
Oderberg, David 2000, ²2005. Applied Ethics. A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Oxford, Blackwell.
Oliver, Kelly 2008. What Is Wrong with Animal RightsWhat Is Wrong with (Animal) Rights? Journal of Speculative Philosophy22 (3): 214-224.
O'Neil, Richard A. 1976. On Rawls justification procedure. Philosophy Research Archives 2 (NO 1099).
Ortiz Llueca, Eduardo 2008. Los límites de la bioética consecuencialista: Un análisis de la propuesta de Peter Singer. Cuadernos de Bioetica 19 (67): 449-458.
Otteson, James R. 2000. Limits on Our Obligation to Give. Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (3): 183-203.
Paden, Roger 2002. Reviewed Item: Singer, Peter 1999. A Darwinian Left. New Haven. Journal of Value Inquiry 36: 129-133.
Paden, Roger 1992. Deconstructing Speciesism: The Domain Specific Character of Moral Judgments. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1): 55-64.
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde 1993. Peter Singer on Euthanasia. The Monist 76 (2): 135-157.
Peard, Thomas W. 2007. Reply to Russell Jacobs' 'World Hunger and Self-Sacrifice: Response on Behalf of the Skeptic. Southwest Philosophy Review 23 (1): 215-219.
Perry, Constance K. 2001. A Compassionate Autonomy Alternative to Speciesism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22(3): 237-246.
Persson, Ingmar 1999. Harming the Non-Conscious. Bioethics 13 (3-4): 294-305.
Persson, Ingmar 1995. Peter Singer on Why Persons are Irreplaceable. Utilitas 7 (1): 55-66.
Peterson, Martin 2004. Foreign Aid and the Moral Value of Freedom. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3): 293-307.
Philosophia Christi - Evangelical Philosophical Society, 1999- http://www.epsociety.org/ Several articles mention P. Singers work.
Pierce, Christine 1979. Can Animals be Liberated? Philosophical Studies 36: 69-75.
Pigden, Charles R. 1996. Bertrand Russell: A Neglected Ethicist. In. Monk, Ray (ed.). Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Bristol, Thoemmes: 331-361.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1981. Must an Opponent of Animal Rights Also Be an Opponent of Human Rights? Inquiry 24: 229-241. Reprinted in: Palmer, Clare (ed.) 2008.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1983. Two conceptions of an environmental ethics and their implications. Between the Species 4: 110-127.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1986. Speciesism revisted. Between the Species 2: 184-189.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1988. When is it morally acceptable to kill animals? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1 (3): 211-224.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1988. Is there a morally relevant difference between human and animal nonpersons? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1: 59-68.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1988. Speciesism: A Form of Bigotry or a Justified View? Between the Species 4: 83-96.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1988. Moral Agents and Moral Patients. Between the Species 4: 32-45.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1990. Utilitarian Killing, Replacement, and Rights. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2): 147-171.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1992. Who Can Be Morally Obligated to Be a Vegetarian? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2): 189-215.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1993. Arguing Away Suffering: The Neo Cartesian Revival. Between the Species 9 (1): 27-41.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1993. On Vegetarianism, Morality, and Science: A Counter Reply. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6 (2): 185-213.
Pluhar, Evelyn 1995. Beyond Prejudice. The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
Pluhar, Evelyn 2006. Legal and Moral Rights of Sentient Beings and the Full Personhood View. Organization and Environment 19 (2): 275-279.
Pöltner, Günther 1993. Die konsequenzialistische Begründung des Lebensschutzes. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 47 (2): 184-203.
Potts, Michael / Verheijide, Joseph L. / Rady, Mohamed Y. / Evans, David W. 2010. Normative Consent and Presumed Consent for Organ Donation: A Critique. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8): 498-499.
Prabhu, V. / Kalita, Tanuja 2011. Understanding the Role of 'Person' in Ethics: Buddhist and Singer Perspective. Suvidya: Journal of Philosophy and Religion 5 (2): 97-104.
Pullman, Daryl 2002. Universalism, particularism and the ethics of dignity. Christian Bioethics 7 (3): 333-358.
Pullman, Daryl 2010. Human non-persons, feticide, and the erosion of dignity. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (4): 353-364.
Quilter, John G. 2005. Why Do They Hate Us. Thick and Thin? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (3): 241-260.
Radcliffe Richards, Janet 1997. Equality of Opportunity. Ratio 10 (3): 253-279.
Ramsay, Hayden 1998. Distinctive Moralities. The Value of Life and our Duties to the Handicapped. Journal of Value Inquiry 32 (4): 507-517.
Ranganathan, Bharat 2012. On Helping One's Neighbor. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (4): 653-677.
Regan, Tom 1975. The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5: 181-214. Reprinted in: Regan, T. 1982.
Regan, Tom 1976. Feinberg on What Sorts of Beings Can Have Rights. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14: 485-498. Reprinted in: Regan, T. 1982.
Regan, Tom 1976. McCloskey on Why Animals Cannot Have Rights. Philosophical Quarterly 26: 251-257.
Regan, Tom / Jamieson, Dale 1978. Animal Rights: A Reply to Frey`s "Animal Rights". Analysis 38: 32-36.
Regan, Tom 1978. Fox's Critique of Animal Liberation. Ethics 88: 126-133.
Regan, Tom 1979. Singer's Critique of the Market. Analysis 39: 115-117.
Regan, Tom 1979. An Examination and Defense of One Argument Concerning Animal Rights. Inquiry 22: 189-219. Reprinted in: Regan, Tom 1982. (important for the Marginal Cases Argument)
Regan, Tom 1980. Animal Rights, Human Wrongs. Environmental Ethics 2: 99-120. Reprinted in: Regan, Tom 1982.
Regan, Tom 1980. Utilitarianism, Vegetarianism, and Animal Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9: 305-324. Reprinted in: Regan, Tom 1982.
Regan, Tom 1980. Cruelty, Kindness, and Unnecessary Suffering. Philosophy 55: 532-541. Reprinted in: Regan, Tom 1982.
Regan, Tom 1981. The Nature and Possibility of an Environmental Ethic. Environmental Ethics 3: 19-34. Reprinted in: Regan, Tom 1982.
Regan, Tom 1982. Animals and the Law: The Need for Reform. In: Regan, Tom. All That Dwell Therein. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press: 148-164. (Original: Proceedings of Internationalen Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (IVR), World Congress 1979).
Regan, Tom 1982. Frey On Why Animal Cannot Have Simple Desires. Mind 91: 277-280.
Regan, Tom 1982. All That Dwell Therein: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics (10 Essays). Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Regan, Tom 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.
Regan, Tom 1987. The Struggle for Animal Rights (13 Essays). Clark Summit, PA, International Society for Animal Rights.
Reichmann, James B. (S.J.) 2000. Evolution, Animal 'Rights', and the Environment. Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press.
Reid, Mark D. 2010. Moral Agency in 'Mammalia'. Between the Species 13: 1-24.
Riccardo, John C. 2003. Rethinking Peter Singer: The Absolute Uniqueness of the Human. Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association 70 (4): 275-300.
Richards, Stewart 1981. Forethoughts for Carnivores. Philosophy 56: 73-88.
Rider, Benjamin A. 2010. The Ethics of Superlongevity: Should We Cure Death? Philosophy in the Contemporary World 17 (1): 56-65.
Roberto, Samuel / Fernandes, Ashley K. 2013. Reviewed Item: Camosy, Charles 2012 Peter Singer and Christian Ethics. Beyond Polarization. Cambridge, CUP. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (2): 61-62.
Rodríguez López, Blanca 2005. Macbeth y la daga voladora: La consideración utilitarista de las intuiciones morales. Telos: Revista Iberoamerica de Estudios Utilitaristas 14 (2): 109-137.
Rose, David 2008. Peter Singer’s Hegelianism: The Social Context of Equality. Between the Species 13 (8): 1-32 (online cla.calpoly.edu/bts).
Rosenthal, David M. (ed.) 1988. Applied Ethics and Ethical Theory (Ethics in a Changing World). Salt Lake City, University of Utah Press.
Rotschaeffer, William A. / Martinsen, David L. 1984. Singer, Sociobiology and Values: Pure Reason Versus Empirical Reason. Zygon 19: 159-170.
Rotschaeffer, William A. / Martinsen, David L. 1986. Singer: Sociolbiologica y Valores. Dialogo Filosofico 2: 145-147.
Rudnick, Abraham 2007. Other-Consciousness and the Use of Animals As Illustrated in Medical Experiments. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (2): 202-208.
Ruse, Michael (ed.) 2009. Philosophy after Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Ryder, Richard D. 2010. Speciesism Again: The Original Leaflet. Critical Society 2 (Spring): Online: www.criticalsocietyjournal.org.uk.
Sakali, Ferdnand 2012. Euthanasia, a Dilemma in Biomedical Ethics: A Critical Appraisal of Peter Singer's and Luke Gormally's Arguments, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Sandberg, Joakim 2011. Ethics and Intuitions. A Reply to Singer. Journal of Ethics 15 (3): 209-226.
Sapontzis, Steve F 1980. Are animals moral beings? American Philosophical Quarterly 17: 45-52.
Sapontzis, Steve F. 1981. A Critique of Personhood. Ethics91: 607-618.
Sapontzis, Steve F. 1982. Must We Value Life to Have a Right to It? Ethics and Animals 3: 2-11.
Sapontzis, Steve F. 1985. Moral Community and Animal Rights. American Philosophical Quarterly 22: 251-257.
Sapontzis, Steve F.1987. Everyday Morality and Animal Rights. Between the Species3: 107-127.
Sapontzis, Steve F. 1987, ²1992. Morals, Reason and Animals. Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Press.
Sapontzis, Steve F. 1988. Speciesism. Between the Species 4: 97-99.
Sapontzis, Steve F 1988. On Justifying the Exploitation of Animals in Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 13: 177-196.
Scarlett, Brian 1984. The moral status of embryos. Journal of Medical Ethics 10: 79-80.
Scarlett, Brian 1997. The Moral Uniqueness of the Human Animal. In. Oderberg, David (ed.). Human Lives: Critical Essays on Consequentialist Bioethics. New York, Macmillan: 77-95.
Schedler, George 2005. Does Ethical Meat Eating Maximize Utility? Social Theory and Practice 31 (4): 499-511.
Scheffler, Uwe 1997. Die 'Heiligkeit des Lebens' in der Philosophie. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 5: 481-487.
Schockenhoff, Eberhard ³2000, 1993. Ethik des Lebens. Ein theologischer Grundriß. Mainz, Mathias Grünewald Verlag.
Schöne-Seifert, Bettina / Rippe, Klaus Peter 1991. Silencing the Singer: Antibioethics in Germany. Hasting Center Report 21: 20 -27.
Schonsheck, Jonathan 1989. Constraints on the expanding circle: A critique of Singer. In. Lee, Sander H. (ed.). Inquiries into values. Lewiston, NY, Mellen Press: 695-707.
Schweickart, David 2008. Global Poverty: Alternative Perspectives on What We Should Do - and Why. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4): 471-491.
Schudt, Karl 2003. Are Animal Rights Inimical to Human Dignity? Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77: 189-203.
Scruton, Roger 2000. Animal Rights City Journal - New York http://www.city-journal.org/html/10_3_urbanities-animal.html Singer's works, remarkably for a philosophy professor, contain little or no philosophical argument.
Sencerz, Stefan 2011. Utilitarianism and Replaceability Revisited or Are Animals Expendable? Between the Species 14 (1): 81-106.
Shaw, William H. 1980. Intuition and moral philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly 17: 127-134.
Sigl, Constanze 1991. Singers 'Praktische Ethik' und ihre gesellschaftliche Relevanz. Kriterion 1 (2): 29-32.
Sikora, R. I. 1975. Utilitarianism: The classical principle and the average principle. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5: 409-419.
Sikora, R. I. 1975. Facts, promising and obligation. Philosophy 50: 352-355.
Silvers, Anita 2000. Super Villainous or Mild Mannered? American Philosophical Association Newsletters: Philosophy and Medicine 99 (2): 250-253.
Skelton, Anthony 2011. Utilitarian Practical Ethics: Sidgwick and Singer. In. Crisp, Roger (ed.). Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Henry Sidgwick. Catania, CUECM.
Skelton, Anthony 2001. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (4): 574-576.
Slicer, Deborah 1991. Your Daughter or Your Dog? A Feminist Assessment of the Animal Research Issue. Hypatia 6: 108-124. Reprinted in: Palmer, Clare (ed.) 2008.
Smart, Brian 1981. General Desires As Grounds for the Wrongness of Killing. Inquiry 24: 242-251.
Smith, Wesley J. 2000. Culture of Death: The Assault on Medical Ethics in America New York, NY, Encounter Books.
Smith, Wesley J. 2008.07.28. The Triumph of Peter Singer’s Values: Animal Rights More Important Than Human. http://www.lifenews.com/2008/07/28/bio-2518.
Smith, Wesley J. 2010. A Rat Is a Pig Is a Dog Is a Boy: The Human Cost of the Animal Rights Movement. Foreword by Dean Koontz. New York, NY, Encounter Books.
Specter, Michael 1999.09.06. Profile: The dangerous philosopher. Peter Singer's belief that animals should be treated like people gave birth to the animal-rights movement. Does he also think that people should be treated like animals? The New Yorker: http://www.michaelspecter.com/1999/09/the-dangerous-philosopher/
Stangl, Rebecca Lynn 2010. Selective Terminations and Respect for the Disabled. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (1): 32-45.
Steigleder, Klaus 2003. Die Unterscheidung zwischen Menschen und Personen. Zur Debatte in der Medizinethik. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik (8): 95-115.
Steinbock, Bonnie 1978. Speciesism and the Idea of Equality. Philosophy 53: 247-256.
Sterba, James P. 1980. Abortion, distant peoples and future generations. Journal of Philosophy 77: 424-439.
Stewart, Robert M. 1984. Morality and the market in blood. Journal of Applied Philosophy 1: 227-238.
Sutton, Agneta 2008. Christian Bioethics: A Guide for the Perplexed. London, T & T Clark - Imprint Continuum.
Sutton, Agneta 2012. Two very different concepts of Human dignity. Catholic Medical Quarterly - UK 62 (3): 26-29 "And so, since the Christian concept of human dignity is inseparable from the principle of the sanctity of human life, on a Christian understanding both ‘after birth abortion’ and ‘prenatal infanticide’ are gravely wrong."
Tannenbaum, Jerrold / Rowan, Andrew 1985. Rethinking the morality of animal research. Hastings Center Report 15: 32-43.
Teichman, Jenny 1985. The Definition of Person. Philosophy60: 175-185.
Teichman, Jenny 1992. Humanism and Personism. The false philosophy of Peter Singer. Quadrant Magazine 36 (12): 26-29.
Teichman, Jenny 1994. Freedom of Speech and the Public Platform. Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (1): 99-105.
Teichman, Jenny 2000. Dr. Jekyll & Mr. Hyde. A review of A Darwinian Left: Politics, Evolution, and Cooperation, by Peter Singer & Singer and His Critics, edited by Dale Jamieson. The New Criterion 19 (October): http://www.newcriterion.com/articles.cfm/jekyllhyde-teichman-2339
Thevathasan, Pravin 2013. Reviewed Item. Camosy, Charles C. 2012. Peter Singer and Christian Ethics. Beyond Polarization. Cambridge, CUP. Catholic Medical Quarterly. Journal of the Catholic Medical Association (UK): http://www.cmq.org.uk/Book-Reviews/Singer-and-Christian-ethics.html
Thompson, Paul B. 2010. Food Aid and the Famine Relief Argument (Brief Return). Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3): 209-227.
Thorens, Adele 2004. Peter Singer et 'La libération animale': une approche critique autour de la notion de 'spécisme'. Revue de Theologie et de Philosophie 136 (2): 149-165.
Tillman, Rachel 2011. Ethical Embodiment and Moral Reasoning. A Challenge to Peter Singer. Hypatia 28 (1): 18-31.
Tobin, Bernadette 2005. Australian Consequentialism. An Australian Critique. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26: 165–173.
Tollefson, Christopher 2004. Abortion and the Human Animal. Christian Bioethics: Non-Eucumenical Studies in Medical Ethics 10: 105-116.
Tollefsen, Christopher 2011. Mind the Gap: Charting the Distance between Christian and Secular Bioethics. Christian Bioethics17 (1): 47-53. “Page 49: II. The dignity of the human person in christian bioehtics.”
Torres Aldave, Mikel 201. De lobos y ovejas: ¿les debemos algo a los animales salvajes? Agora: Papeles de Filosofia (Santiago de Compostela) 30 (2): 77-98.
Tuohey, John / Ma, Terence P. 1992. Fifteen Years After "Animal Liberation": Has the Animal Rights Movement Achieved Philosophical Legitimacy? Journal of Medical Humanities 13 (2): 79-89.
Unger, Peter 2001. Science and the Possibility of Philosophy. Harvard Review of Philosophy 9: 46-56.
Unger, Peter 2001. Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1): 203-216.
Uniacke, Suzanne / McCloskey, H. J. 1992. Peter Singer and Non-Voluntary Euthanasia': Tripping Down the Slippery Slope. Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2): 203-219.
VanDeVeer, Donald 1979. Interspecific Justice. Inquiry 22: 55-79.
Varner, Gary 1994. The Prospects for Consensus and Convergence in the Animal Rights Debate. Hastings Center Report 24 (1): 24-28.
Varner, Gary 1998, 2002. In Nature's Interests? Interests, Animal Rights, and Environmental Ethics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Varner, Gary 2012. Personhood, Ethics, and Animal Cognition: Situating Animals in the Two-Level Utilitarianism of R.M. Hare. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Viano, Carlo Augusto 1997. Uccidere è lecito. Rivista di Filosofia 88 (2): 315-321.
Villanueva, Gonzalo 2016. "‘The Bible’ of the animal movement: Peter Singer and animal liberation, 1970-1976." History Australia 13(3): 399-414.
Villanueva, Gonzalo. 2018. Against Animal Liberation? Peter Singer and His Critics. Sophia. 57: 5–19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11841-017-0597-6
Voorhoeve, Alex (ed.) 2011. Conversations on Ethics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Wade, Maurice 1996. Sports and Speciesism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 23: 10-29.
Walker, Mark 2007. Superlongevity and Utilitarianism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4): 581-595.
Walters, Kerry S / Portmess, Lisa (eds.) 1999. Ethical Vegetarianism. From Pythagoras to Peter Singer. Albany, NY, State University of New York Press.
Watt, Helen 1989. Singer on abortion: a utilitarian critque. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 67 (2): 227-229.
Wavre, Robert 2000. Reviewed item: Jamieson, Dale (ed.) 1999 Singer and His Critics. Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2): 229-231.
Weber, Elijah 2010. A Difference That Makes a Difference. Welfare and the Equality of Consideration. Between the Species13: 84-97.
Wells, Deane 1987. Ectogenesis, justice and utiltiy: a reply to James. Bioethics 1: 372-379.
Weinberg, Rivka 2009. It Ain't My World. Utilitas 21 (2): 144-162.
Weir, Jack 1986. Mental States and Inherent Value. Southwest Philosophy Review 3: 70-80 (In recent publications defending animal rights, Tom Regan has criticized Peter Singer for locating moral value in intrinsically valuable mental states.)
Wenz, Peter S. 1979. Act-utilitarianism and animal liberation. Personalist 60: 423-428.
Wetlesen, Jon 1999. The Moral Status of Beings Who Are Not Persons: A Casuistic Argument. Environmental Values 8: 287-323.
White, Frederick J. 2013. Personhood: An essential characteristic of the human species. Linacre Quarterly: Journal of the Catholic Medical Association 80 (1): 74-97.
White, James E. 1982. Are sentient beings replaceable? Ethics and Animals 3: 91-95.
Wichmann, Soren Sofu / Petersen, Thomas Sobirk 2013Singer*. Poverty Relief: Philanthropy versus Changing the System: A Critical Discussion of Some Objections to the 'Singer Solution'. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1): 3-11.
Wieseler, Christine 2012. A Philosophical Investigation: Interrogating Practices and Beliefs about Disability. In. Gauthier, Jeff (ed.). Freedom, Religion, and Gender. Charlottesville, PDC.
Williams, Meredith 1980. Rights, interest and moral equality. Environmental Ethics 2: 149-162.
Williams, Reginald 2011. Combating Long-Term Poverty: A Thought Piece. Poverty and Public Policy 3 (2): 1-13.
Wilson, Scott 2005. The Species-Norm Account of Moral Status. Between the Species 13: 1-29.
Wisor, Scott 2011. Against Shallow Ponds: An Argument against Singer's Approach to Global Poverty. Journal of Global Ethics 7 (1): 19-32.
Wolf, Jean-Claude 1990. Singer über Rechte, Recht auf Leben und Euthanasie. Analyse und Kritik 12: 219-225.
Wood, Adam 2007. A 'Liberal' Mean between Singer and His Critics? Three Views on Poverty and Giving. Kinesis: Graduate Journal in Philosophy 34 (1): 27-42.
Wreen, Michael 1984. In Defence of Speciesism. Ethics and Animals 3: 47-60.
Young, Thomas 1984. The Morality of Killing Animals: Four Arguments. Ethics and Animals 5: 88-101.
Zamir, Tzachi 2006. Is Speciesism Opposed to Liberationism? Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel 34(4): 465-475.
Zamir, Tzachi 2007. Ethics and the Beast: A Speciesist Argument for Animal Liberation. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.